文档介绍：乡村治权与分类治理:
农民上访研究的范式转换
申端锋
■
[内容提要]学界对农民上访的研究大多基于农民权利意识不断增长这一判断而展开,形
成了农民上访研究的维权范式税费改革后,基层政权弱化而农民上访增多这一现象对
。
维权范式构成了直接挑战,农民上访研究呼唤一种新的研究范式本文试图从乡村治权
。
而非农民维权的角度对农民上访进行研究作者在和平乡的田野调查表明,和平乡年
。 30
来农民上访的变迁正是乡村治权逐步弱化的结果,乡村治权的具体体现就是分类治理
。
当前信访治理的困境是无法对上访者进行定性,信访治理没有原则政权性质的模糊致
。
使分类治理丧失了原则,而蜕化为纯粹的治理技术,从而出现了有分类无治理的治理
“”
困境从这个意义上讲,当前基层政权的社会主义性质应该进一步明确
。。
[关键词]上访维权治权分类治理
:
Abstract Previous studies of the phenomena of farmer petition have been mostly focused on
,
the farmers’growing awareness of protecting their own rights but this paradigm has now been
,
challenged. The author’s field research in Heping village shows that after the reform of rural
,
taxes and fees the rural administrative jurisdiction at the grassroots level has been weakened
,
to the extent that it is no longer adequate to the farmers’needs and hence the farmers’in-
creasing petition to higher authorities. Village administration operates on the basis of assorted
, ,
governance and since the administration cannot sort out the nature of the petitions it is criti-
cally handicapped. The author maintains that it is the inadequacy of village administrative juris-
, ,
diction rather than the farmers’heightened consciousness of self -protection that is driving
,
more farmers into petition to higher authorities. In light of this the author strongly suggests that
the socialist nature of village administrative jurisdiction should be further clarified.
: , , ,
Keywords petition protection of rights the right to rule assorted governance
□
05
开放时代
2010/06
一问题的提出
、
税费改革以后,乡村体制改革作为配套改革随即启动此后,乡村两级组织权力弱
。
化,财政困难,服务型政府的逻辑在乡村治理中并未凸显,而是出现了软指标的硬指标
“
化逻辑乡村两级由于财力紧张,权力弱化,无法将公共服务和公共品供给作为硬指标
”。①
加以落实,而只能将资料发放报表等软指标作为硬指标来做,乡村治理缺乏实质性的内
、
容,乡村两级组织与农民之间的关系迅速疏远,甚至变得没有关系,用农民的话来说就
是,干部拿干部的工资,农民种农民的田有学者将这一现象称为基层政权的悬浮,
“”。“”
即税费改革后的乡镇政权越来越成为一个悬浮型政权,其治理功能无法得到真正落
②“”
实,乡村治理陷入新的困境之中,表现为公共品供给的无法达成,以乡村组织为主导的农
民一致行动日趋不可能,农民集体主义观念丧失殆尽