文档介绍：Abstract
Independent directors, as one special group of directors, distinguished
themselves from general directors with their inherent characters, especially the feature
of “independence”. The independence, in the essence, lies in the fact that independent
directors have no direct or indirect in pany where are incumbent.
The independent directors system was officially introduced into our country in
order to improve pany’anization of the board of directors, to reinforce the
supervisor of internal directors and managers, to protect the benefit of middle or little
shareholder and the relatives, and to guarantee the standard running of pany.
However, the independent directors system did not achieve the expected goals due to
the inadequate preparation in theory and practice. The independent directors system
was weak to approach the problems. Thus, criticism of the systems increasingly
comes throughout the country. To trace its source, it resulted from the lack of the
independent director’s independence.
For the reference to the perfection of the independent directors system, this thesis
studies its standards for judgment, parison for the independence of
independent directors and as well as the perfection of the independent directors
system. The first part of the thesis defines the independence of independent directors
by identity, business and operation mechanism and interests. The second part
introduces different standard for judgment in terms of the independence of
independent directors by western countries. The last part clarifies defects of
independence of independent directors of China from identity, interests, business and
operation mechanism. Based on the analysis, proposes suggestions related to the
improvement of the independence of independent directors respectively, such as the
establishment of the society of independent directors, the right to raise lawsuits, the
establishment of incentive system in the form of reputation pensation, t