文档介绍：南京艺术学院
硕士学位论文
徐渭书法风格研究及作品辨析
姓名:贾砚农
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:美术学
指导教师:黄惇
20090420
南京艺术学院学位论文

内容摘要

在徐渭书法研究,业已成为书法研究领域中的一个热点的时候,我们对徐渭书法风
格的认识却还相当的模糊。有鉴于此,本文通过对历史记载以及现存书迹的梳理,发现
徐渭书法当以“姿媚跃出”为其风格特色。为了验证这一观点,本文又对今存署名徐渭
的书画作品,按书法风格(画之题款)分类,并选取其中的重要作品进行了真伪辨析。
以“姿媚”跃出为其风格的作品,不但与历史记评的风格特征相吻合,而且相当精彩;
而“俗媚”风格的作品与“雄强”风格的作品,虽然占作品总数的 %,但它们中代
表作品不仅与历史记录的风格不符,而且在文字内容等方面也存有诸多不合常理的讹
误。结论是:徐渭书法只有“姿媚”跃出一种风格;徐渭自言“吾书第一”完全是出于
对书法传统精髓把握的自信;正因为赝品数量太多,才使人们对徐渭书法风格产生捉摸
不定错觉;而赝品中的诸多讹误很可能与作伪者抄录了劣本诗文集有关。

[关键词] 徐渭书法风格姿媚跃出赝品

1
南京艺术学院学位论文

ABSTRACT

Though Xuwei’s calligraphy has e a hot field in the calligraphic
research, the knowledge of his calligraphic style is still ambiguous. Based on the
comprehensive study of the history of Xuwei’s calligraphy, we conclude that
Xuwei’s style is “eyesome”. For validate the result, we categorized the
calligraphic works with Xuwei’s signature, and distinguished the genuine pieces
from the faked ones. Those works characterized with the eyesome style are fully
consistent with the historical reviews of Xu’s work, and are obviously
outstanding among other pieces. Among those flattering and forceful pieces,
although they are % of all his works, even the magnum opuses are not
identical to documentary files mon-sense mistakes in the text content.
The conclusion is that Xu’s style is only eyesome. Xu’s saying “My calligraphy
is No. one” is based on his grest confidence on his master on the essence of the
Chinese traditional calligraphy. The ambiguity on Xu’s calligraphy style is
basically from the large amount of the forged pieces, which confuses the
reviewers. The text and content mistakes in the faked pieces may be from
duplicated words from low-grade poems.

KEY WORDS:Xuwei Calligraphy Style Eyesome Fake

2
南京艺术学院学位论文
图版目录

(图 1) 荣宝斋藏《徐渭诗稿》手卷⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 9
(图 2) 倪瓒小楷《淡室诗轴》⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 9
(图 3) 台北故宫博物院藏米芾行