1 / 5
文档名称:

Comparison of Structural Seismic Design Using AASHTO, IBC and AREMA.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:5
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

Comparison of Structural Seismic Design Using AASHTO, IBC and AREMA.pdf

上传人:bolee65 2014/3/5 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

Comparison of Structural Seismic Design Using AASHTO, IBC and AREMA.pdf

文档介绍

文档介绍:Structures 2009: Don't Mess with Structural Engineers © 2009 ASCE 2364
Comparison of Structural Seismic Design using AASHTO, IBC
and AREMA
Author:
Xuezeng Wu , . , , 605 3rd Ave, New York, NY, 10158.
tshwu@
ABSTRACT
In current seismic design practice, AASHTO, AREMA and IBC are the most popular
specifications for highway bridges, railway bridges and building structures, respectively.
Theoretical speaking, when earthquakes occurred, the structures would be damaged with
no exception regardless of their functionalities. But the seismic design approaches and
requirements in these three specifications demonstrate significant differences in many
aspects.
It is necessary to make a parison of these three specifications in terms
of seismic design in order to carry out reasonable seismic analysis on some multi•
function structures which are including building structure and bridges for vehicles or
trains, or both. A good example of this type of structures is multi•model transportation
center which is normally appearing in metropolitan area. In the seismic analysis of this
type of structure, some additional coordination work among these specifications is critical
in order to achieve correct results.
Theoretical parametric investigations have been made pare these three
specifications in terms of seismic design. Some mendations are provided for