1 / 70
文档名称:

王船山《诗经稗疏》训诂的研究.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:70页
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

王船山《诗经稗疏》训诂的研究.pdf

上传人:2890135236 2014/6/10 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

王船山《诗经稗疏》训诂的研究.pdf

文档介绍

文档介绍:吉首大学
硕士学位论文
王船山《诗经稗疏》训诂研究
姓名:陈卫南
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:汉语言文字学
指导教师:刘精盛
20100501
摘要
摘要
王船山是明末清初著名的三大儒之一,其治学涉猎广泛,著述宏富。在哲学
上成就斐然,在传统小学研究上也卓然成为一家,而且其哲学研究是建立在对传
世经典文献语言文字的校雠、注疏上。
《诗经稗疏》是船山疏释《诗经》的著作,主要考订《诗经》名物典章制度
等内容,对毛《传》、郑《笺》以及朱子《诗集传》等多有辨正。船山继承了《诗
经》汉学重视名物训诂的传统,但并不盲从前人旧说。他幼时遍读群书,又极意
研究四方之事,加上长期的乡居生活,结交有精通自然科学之士,其积累的科学
知识和生产实践经验之丰富广博,非一般学者所能及,故船山疏释《诗经》多有
创获。
该书的体例为逐条疏释,共计有 229 条。本文通过借鉴前人的研究方法和成
果,全面考察《诗经稗疏》一书的训诂内容,总结其训诂得失,以探求其对《诗
经》研究以及训诂学发展所起的作用。
全文共分为四部分。第一部分介绍《诗经稗疏》作者及其著作、研究动态综
述、研究价值;第二部分分析《诗经稗疏》对《诗经》故训的继承与发展;第三
部分研究《诗经稗疏》一书所取得的训诂成就;第四部分探讨《诗经稗疏》的训
诂阙失。


主题词:船山;诗经稗疏;训诂
第 i 页
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
Wang Chuan-shan is one of the three well-known scholars during the last period of
Ming Dynasty and the early period of Qing did scholarly research in a wide
field and extensive writings。he had made remarkable achievements in Philosophical
studies which was based on the collation and interpretation of the classic masterpieces
of literature language ,and also has been distinctive in traditional exegesis.
ShiJing BaiShu is a work that Wang chuan-shan annotated ShiJing. it is the main
task which to research exegesis about ancient things and systems and to discern and
judge the special exegetical monograph about ShiJing such as MaoZhuan,ZhengJian
and ShiJiZhuan and so inherited the tradition which was paid attention to
exegesis about things and systems in Han Dynasty,all the same ,he did never follow
predecessors's argument indiscriminate,as a result his insights was distinctive.
The style of ShiJing BaiShu is one by one to explain and the number of entries are
229 in all. In this paper,I intends to make prehensive review of exegetical content
in ShiJing BaiShu through referring to methods and results of our predecessors and sum
up the esses and shortfalls of exegesis in order to find out the role for the research
of ShiJing and the development of exegesis.
The thesis posed of four p