文档介绍：中文摘要本文针对当前检察理论上争议的热点问题?一“公诉权的性质”,从历史和现实的角度考察了公诉权的应有属性,重点介绍了我国学术界关于公诉权性质争论的各种观点,分别从公诉权的历史发展、各国公诉体制的比较、程序正义与公诉权的关系、公诉权的非司法性等方面论证了公诉权的本质属性,并围绕公诉权的应有属性详尽地论述了我国现代公诉制度的构建设想。具体说来, 文章包括以下几个主要部分: 引言部分从目前学术界对检察权的争论说开去,引出检察权的核心部分?公诉权本质属性的争论,并着重阐述了论文选题的原因、研究的范围、论文的思路以及运用的研究方法等内容; 第一部分着重介绍了目前我国学术界对于公诉权性质的争论,并详细介绍了“行政权说”、“司法权说”、“准司法权说”或“双重属性说”、“法律监督权说”的内容和主要理由,提出应该本着民主与科学的精神,对公诉权的本质属性重新进行定位。第二部分从公诉权的历史发展、各国的公诉体制及模式、程序正义的要求、公诉权的“去司法性”四个方面详尽地论述了公诉权的本质属性是多层次的, 公诉权应该有其自身的独立价值。第三部分侧重于对我国构建现代公诉制度的思考,分别就职业公诉人制度的构建、公诉权与法律监督权的剥离、公诉人应如何加强行政性、公诉人的当事人化、公诉职能的范围五个方面进行论述。文章的结语部分展望了我国公诉权回归其本质属性的难度和具体的立法障碍,呼吁了学术界放弃部门利益之争,以更加独立的学术品格推动我国法律体制的变革。关键词:公诉权本质属性公诉制度构建设想 Abstract The attributeofpublic prosecution power is acurrent controversial issue inattorney thesis intends to investigate the due attribute ofpublic prosecution power from theperspective ofhistory and introduces different views on thisissue intheacademic world of our country and addresses itsessential properties by means of exploring paring thejudicial system of differentcountries,analyzing therelationship between proceeding justice and public prosecution and also thenon-judicial aspect of public prosecution author offers a detailed exposition to the framework of oarmodem prosecution speaking,the thesisisconsisted ofthefollowing fiveparts: The introductory partbegins with thecontroversy on prosecution power inthepresent academics and from thatwe elicit the core thecontention on theessential attributes ofpublic prosecution mainly accounts fortheselectionof theresearch topic,the scope ofthe research andtheadopted research methodology aswell. The firstpartmainly introducescontentions on public prosecution power inthe present academics of our country and gives adetailed exposition to“theory ofexecutive power”,“theory ofjudicial power”, ‘‘theory ofquasi-judicial power'’or“theory of dual attributes”,and “theory oflegalsupervision power’.The reposition ofessential attributes ofp