文档介绍：摘要 1111111 EI Y1942566 摘要随着社会的高速发展,“碰瓷”行为正以其强大的破坏力及社会危害性吸引了越来越多人的关注。“碰瓷”犯罪的社会危害性极大,应当将其纳入刑法的视野予以谴责和非难。然而,学界对“碰瓷”行为的刑法定性问题却长期存在着争议,究竟应当以何种罪名予以认定在司法实践中众说纷纭。笔者认为,对“碰瓷”案件的刑法定性问题不能一刀切,而应具体情况具体分析。一般认为,要从行为发生的时间、地点、路段、路况、行为人的主观故意、客观造成的后果等方面来综合判断。如果行为人采用了威胁、恐吓等手段来逼迫被害人交付财物, 则应根据其严重程度认定为敲诈勒索罪或抢劫罪;如果行为人采用了虚构事实、隐瞒真相的方式使得被害人基于错误认识而处分财物,则应认定为诈骗罪;如果行为人的“碰瓷”行为足以危害公共安全,致使其他不特定多数人的合法权益处于随时可能受到侵害的危险状态中,由于此时其手段行为(碰瓷行为)与目的行为(获得财物)存在牵连关系,则应当依照牵连犯从一重处的原则,认定为以危险方法危害公共安全罪。如此认定和处理不仅不违背刑法的罪刑法定原则,而且有利于打击违法犯罪行为,维护社会的和谐与稳定。关键词:碰瓷:敲诈勒索罪;诈骗罪:以危险方法危害公共安全罪:同伙死亡目录 ABSTRACT With therapiddevelopment ofsociety,”touchporcelain”behavior wim its strong destructiveandsocialharm gets more and more people’S ”Touchporcelain”social harm isgreat,shall becondemned and decriedby the ,circles on”touch porcelain”behavior aboutitscriminal qualitativeproblem there are debatedfor along time,and therearemany kindsof voicesabout whatcharges shallberecognized inthejudicial author arguesthat the”touchporcelain”case ofcriminalqualitative problem cannot be one sizefitsall,butshouldparticular case ,it shouldbe analyzed with thefollowing factors:when,where,the road’Ssituation,theoffender’S subjective intent,objective aspects oftheconsequences of the offender usedthreatsandintimidation topersecute thevictim means goods delivery,the c敬is identified aSextortion sin ording to itsseverity; Iftheoffenderusedunrealfacts,to llidethetruthbased on erroneous understanding and make the caseshallbe determined嬲a fraud;Ifthe offender’S”touchporcelain”behavior enough toendangers public safety,causing other no specific mostpeople’S legitimaterights andinterestsindanger of encroach onany possible state,itCan beidentified弱the crimeofendangering publicsecurity 、衍thdangerous means to,in accordance with aheavy involvement made fromthe principle,because hereitsmethodbehavior(touchporcelainbehavior)andobjective behavior(for pro