文档介绍：expansion in dispute. And regarding to whether people whose position as the unexpected
inheritance are in the range of subjective range of Res Judicata, there are theory about shared
interests, reflection effect and overall expansion at issue. From the point of necessity, that is
the idea of disputes thoroughly solved, this article claims that the Be Bear People and people’s
position as the unexpected inheritance are in the range of subjective range of Res Judicata.
This article bs many sorts of circumstances about Legal Litigation Executive to the
best ability and their subjective range of Res Judicata.
Part III: the legitimacy of expansion of subjective range of Res Judicata in Legal
Litigation Executive. From the point of legitimacy, this part proceeds from the idea of
procedure guarantee and demonstrates that it is reasonable to expand Res Judicata to the Be
Bear People and people’s position as the unexpected inheritance. Then the article further
suggests the idea of disputes thoroughly solved and procedure guarantee together as the basis
to determine the subjective range of Res Judicata. On the new theory of procedure guarantee
in Taiwan, this article analyses the prior procedure guarantee and ex post procedure guarantee
the Be Bear People and people’s position as the unexpected inheritance should have. And
between authority notice and litigation told, between the third revocation of litigation and the
expansion of the plaintiff’s fitness of retrial lawsuit, the author will make a selection. At last,
reconsidering the third person system, the article thinks the system of third person,
particularly the system of no independent claim to the third person has the inherent drawbacks
that one-sided pursuit disputes thoroughly solved and ignoring procedure guarantee.
Part IV: the intersection between subjective range of Res Judicata and subjective range of
Execution in Legal Litigation Executive. Generally thinking, Res Judi