文档介绍：华中科技大学
硕士学位论文
技术的意义—海德格尔技术观与马克思技术观比较研究
姓名:彭莉
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:马克思主义哲学
指导教师:张曙光;张廷国
20060426
摘要

技术使社会发生了巨大变革技术也成为了现代性的标志之一。在技术对人类生活
产生巨大影响的同时,海德格尔和马克思都对技术现象与技术本质产生过思考、追问
与分析。本文旨在对两位大哲学家的技术观进行比较、分析梳理从而使我们对海德格
尔和马克思的技术观有一个更为系统的了解。
本文分析了海德格尔对技术的追问,并揭示了海德格尔认为现代技术的本质是座
架,是一种限定、强求和控制,使事物放弃本真的存在,而进入一种非自然的状态。
马克思则认为技术的本质是工业,是推动社会进步的杠杆,同时技术又是一种自身异
化和劳动异化的活动。
从两者的共性上来说,海德格尔和马克思在承认传统技术的工具性前提下,都对
技术带来的负面影响进行了批判,尽管二者之间存在着本质区别。

关键词:技术座架异化
I
Abstract

Technique makes the society take place bigness to replace, the technique also became
one of the marking of modern. Produce the bigness influence to the human life at the same
time in the technique, Heidegger and Marx both to think many views of technique, they also
question and analyze some mark with technique. This thesis aim pare b two
big philosophers views of technique, so as to make us having an further and system
understanding to Heidegger and Marx’s views of technique that they have been to think.
This thesis analyzed the asking of technique in Heidegger, and to open out that
Heidegger thinks that innate character in modern technical is a kind of limit, demanding with
control, make thing abandoned its really esse, but enter a kind of not natural appearance.
Marx thinks that the essence of technique is industry, is a lever which to push our society in
progress, is a kind of oneself dissimilation with the labor dissimilation activity.
monness of both to say, Heidegger and Marx admit the premise of traditional
instrumental technique view, they also judgment the negative influence of the technique
bring to though they have the difference in root.

Keywords: technology framework dissimilation
II
独创性声明

本人声明所呈交的学位论文是本人在导师指导下进行的研究工作及取得的研究
成果。尽我所知,除了文中特别加以标注和致谢中所罗列的内容以外,论文中不包
含其他个人或集体己经发表或撰写过的研究成果。对本文研究做出贡献的个人和集
体均已在论文中作了明确的说明并表示了谢意。本人完全意识到本声明的法律结果
由本人承担。

学位论文作者签名
日期年月日

学位论文版权使用授权书
本学位论文作者完全了解学校有关保留和使用学位论文的规定,即学校有权保
留并向国家有关