1 / 13
文档名称:

个人需求与公司薪酬[文献翻译].doc

格式:doc   页数:13
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

个人需求与公司薪酬[文献翻译].doc

上传人:问道九霄 2012/3/8 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

个人需求与公司薪酬[文献翻译].doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:外文文献翻译译文
外文原文
原文:
The moderating role of individual-difference variables pensation research
Karen E. Flaherty
Statement of hypotheses
In the following discussion, we present study hypotheses. Our hypotheses are broken into two distinct sections. First, we focus on the interplay between the individual-level variables pany pay mix. The individual-level variables are expected to affect the relationship between pay mix and motivation in very different ways. For instance, we argue that career stage will interact with pay mix to affect expectancies and instrumentalities of the salespeople. Second, we argue that risk attitudes are expected to interact with pay mix to affect valences for pay increases.
Career stage and pay mix
Cron et al. (1988) hypothesized that career stage influences the valences, expectancies, and instrumentalities of salespeople and found support for some of the hypotheses. However, they did not consider possible interactions between career stage and anization’s pay mix. On the basis of this literature, as well pensation research and expectancy theory, we develop several hypotheses concerning salespeople’s valences for pay increases, expectancies, and instrumentalities in each career stage and with different pay mix policies.
Valence. Valence refers to the emotional orientations people hold with respect to rewards such as money, promotions, or even satisfaction (Vroom, 1964). According to expectancy theory, rewards may be intrinsic to the salesperson (. personal development) or they may be extrinsic rewards (. pay increases, promotion, and recognition). Past research indicates that valences for rewards influence the
effectiveness of pensation programs (Lee, 1998). This work has looked at valence for reward as a possible moderator in this relationship.
Past research examining the influence of career stage on reward valences has not been fully supported (. Cron et al., 1988). Not surprisingly, anization’s pay policy or governance struct