文档介绍：ABSTRACT
The crime of illegal absorbing public deposits has experienced a process from legislation, and it is a
high incidence of crime at present. Under current economic conditions, due to the folk spontaneous
financing efficiency, without cumbersome formalities for examination and approval, many enterprises
consider it as the main way for their funding sources, although there are some laws about how to finance
and the means of financing, the folk financing legal system is still not perfect, the risk of folk financing
behavior can not ensure the safety of the funds circulation, it is easy to cause the public property loss, the
seriousness will cause the chaos of national financial credit management order and hinder the development
of market economy.
For the punishment of the illegal absorbing public deposits, if the circumstances are minor, generally
not to be punished, if the circumstances are serious, to impose criminal punishment, such punishment
model can play a blowing role in the harm behavior, however, due to this kind of behavior, it can bring
huge economic benefits for illegal fund raiser, the lure of high profits makes illegal absorbing public
deposits despite repeated prohibition, the actor directly "deposits" or "flip" the folk capital to lend, pose
serious threats to the social public property, such as "the wu ying case" in practice, affecting a wide range,
and causing serious consequences, as to these behavior, criminal law gives severe punishment. But too
harsh punishment also causes extensive controversy among the social people from all walks of life, is
punishment for this kind of behavior right? Or is too much of a good thing? With the development of
market economy is this more good than harm or more harm than good? Suddenly this is ing a topic
to discuss among people.
As to the focus of dispute in practice, the author of this paper, from two aspects of theory and practice
explores the basic problems for illegal absorbing publ