文档介绍：目录
中文摘要 I
Abstract II
引言 1
一、举证时限的概念及性质 1
(一)举证时限制度的概念 1
(二)举证时限制度的性质 1
二、举证时限的价值 2
(一)举证时限制度有利于程序公正的实现 2
(二)举证时限制度有利于诉讼效益的实现 3
(三)举证时限制度有利于维持程序安定 3
(四)设立民事诉讼举证时限制度体现了民事诉讼的诚实信用原则 4
(五)设立民事诉讼举证时限制度有利于完善诉讼制度体系 5
三、我国现行民事诉讼举证时限制度的立法发展和反思 6
(一)我国民事诉讼举证时限制度的建立、发展和现状 6
(二)我国民事诉讼举证时限制度缺陷分析 6
6
8
,提起反诉问题 9
四、完善我国民事诉讼举证时限制度的思考 9
(一)完善我国民事诉讼举证时限制度的具体思路 9
9
2“新的证据”的界定 10
(二)完善民事举证时限制度相匹配的其他诉讼制度 11
11
11
11
12
结语 12
参考文献 12
附录 13
中文摘要
举证时限制度源于西方的证据失权制度,我国《民事诉讼法》对此没有规定,长期以来一直实行证据随时提出主义。最高人民法院于2001年12月1日颁布了《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下称为《证据规定》),举证时限制度才被正式确认下来。举证时限制度的设立有利于实现程序公正、有利于提高诉讼效率、有利于维持程序安定、有利于强化诚实信用原则、有利于完善诉讼制度体系。本文从民事诉讼举证时限制度的概念及性质入手,对设立民事诉讼举证时限制度的价值取向进行了探讨,阐述了我国民事诉讼举证时限制度的建立和发展,并对其现状进行了反思,剖析了我国举证时限制度在适用中存在的问题,并对完善我国民事诉讼举证时限制度提出了具体思路,以期对这一问题做出力所能及的地探索。
关键词:举证时限;举证失权;价值;完善举措
Abstract
Time Limit of Proof of evidence from the loss of the right system in western China, "Civil Law" which does not require a long time been operating under a doctrine of evidence at any time. Supreme People's Court on December 1, 2001 promulgated the "Provisions on Civil Evidence" (hereinafter referred to as "rules of evidence"), was formally recognized proof system down time. Time Limit of Proof is conducive to the establishment of procedural justice, is conducive to efficiency of the proceedings is conducive to the maintenance program stability, conducive to strengthening the principle of good faith litigation system helps improve the system. This time from the civil burden of proof, the concept and nature of the start of the civil burden of proof to establish the value orientation of time the system was discussed, explained the system of civil burden of proof the establishment and development time, and a reflection of their current situation, analyzes the Time Limit of proof problems in the application, and improve the system of civil burden of proof p