文档介绍：,,:InsuitarisingfromanoilspillintheGulfofMexico,paniesinoilindustryfiledcross-motionsforpartialsummaryjudgmentregardingtheirliabilitytoUnitedStatesundertheOilPollutionAct(OPA)andtheCleanWaterAct(CWA).Unitedstatesfiledcross-,三家石油企业提出了在《清洁水法案》和《油污染法案》下关于他们的责任分配的即决判决的交叉动议。美国也提出了关于部分解决判决的交叉动议。Holdings:TheDistrictCourt,CarlBarbier,J.,heldthat:1OilPollutionAct's(OPA)limitsofliabilityappliedtooildischargedfrombothanoffshorefacility,andappurtenances2ownersofoffshorefacilityfromwhichoildischargedintosubsurfaceofGulfofMexicowereliableforcivilpenaltiesunderCleanWaterAct(CWA);owneroroperatorofmobileoffshoredrillingunit(MODU)wasnotprimarilyliableundertheCWAunlessitwasan“operator”oftheoffshorefacilitywithinmeaningofCWAora“personincharge”,2014UnitedStatesDistrictCourt,:UnitedStates,statesofLouisianaandAlabama,andnumerousprivateindividualsandbusinessbroughtactionagainstleaseholderofdeepwateroildrillingsite,ownerandoperatorofDeepwaterHorizondrillingrig,cementingandmudloggingservicescontractor,andmanufacturerofrig'sblowoutpreventer,allegingviolationsofCleanWaterActandOilPollutionActinrelationtoblowoutatrig,-phasedapproachtocase,and,aftergrantinggovernment'spartialsummaryjudgmentmotion,,astowhetherOilPollutionAct'sliabilitylimitsapplied,courtconducted“IncidentPhase”,路易斯安那州和阿拉巴马州以及大量的私人和企业提出了针对深水钻井区的承租人,所有者,操作者,固井及录井服务的提供者和防泄漏装置的制造商提出了诉讼,指控侵犯《清洁水法案》和《油污染法案》导致油污泄漏进入墨西哥湾。法院针对案件采取多阶段审理,承认了部分政府的即决判决动议。至于《油污法案》的限制条件是否被采纳,法院对于相应的主张执行了“事件阶段”审判。02intermediatecourtintermediatecourtThecourthavingbeenpolledattherequestofoneofitsmembers,andamajorityofthejudgeswhoareinregularacti