文档介绍：湘潭大学
硕士学位论文
“诗史”史——宋人杜诗“诗史”批评
姓名:罗汉松
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:中国古典文学
指导教师:徐炼
20050501
Abstract
Song Dynasty’s research on Dufu, the first concept was “Poetry
with historical significance”; And Song Dynasty’s people who
studied on Dufu, the first one was Ou Yangxiu. However, what Ou
yangxiu’s and Wang Anshi’s holdings on it, almost diverted
between their roles of Poems and Statesmen. In another word,
between the dimensions of Moral and Aesthetic. This divertion
eventually resulted in a fake understanding, that was their critics
were seemingly not on the Critic of “Poetry with Historical
Significance”. But in fact, it was just the essentiality that the Critic
took.
Meanwhile, in Song Dynasty, the first person who glorified the
Dufu’s Poetry with Historical Significance was Su Shi. What his
critic on Poetry with Historical Significance bettrer than Ou
Yangxiu’s and Wang Anshi’s was his try to take Loyalty to interpret
Dufu’s works, and by this meaning to reason the concepts of
Dufu’s alike SiMa Qian、to certify his poetry with historic works
and to affairs’ and persons’ recording. And at the basis of it, his
critic reached the goal of conformity of the moral aesthetic and
practical aesthetic. It was Huang Tingjian that stepped after him.
The Poetry-Talks writers’ and Essay-novels writers’ critic on
Dufu’s poetry with historical significance were singled out from the
critic formula from Early Song Dynasty on. They took another new
critic method to replace the old one. It was the mend system
of Poetry alike History. So, the twingle among the so-called
History Writing Pratically, History Writing Techniquely, History
Writing Naturally resulted from the writers’ respectively to grasp
the whole thing by means of taking the angle. And this system had
just deconstructionalized the critic efforts from Ou Yangxiu, early
Song Dynasty.
To re-read the Poetry with Historical Significance should more
extend ascribe