文档介绍：,1889里格斯诉帕尔默案,纽约上诉法院,1889年RightsofLegatees-,JJ.,,不能被解释成继承人为阻止遗嘱人撤销遗嘱,可以通过杀害遗嘱人的方式来获得遗嘱利益。——格雷和丹佛斯法官有不同的法律意见。Appealfromsupremecourt,generalterm,,普通审期,第三法庭。LeslieWRussell,·W·茹塞尔为上诉人辩护;W·M·豪肯斯为被上诉人辩护。EARL,,,inwhichhegavesmalllegaciestohistwodaughters,,theplaintiffsinthisaction,andtheremainderofhisestatetohisgrandson,,subjecttothesupportofSusanPalmer,hismother,withagiftovertothetwodaughters,,unmarried,,atthedateofhiswill,ownedafarm,,andthereafter,inMarch,1882,,withwhom,beforehismarriage,heenteredintoanantenuptialcontract,inwhichitwasagreedthatinlieuofdowerandallotherclaimsuponhisestateincaseshesurvivedhimsheshouldhavehersupportuponhisfarmduringherlife,,andsubsequentlytothedeathofthetestator,Elmerlivedwithhimasamemberofhisfamily,,and,thathemightpreventhisgrandfatherfromrevokingsuchprovisions,whichhehadmanifestedsomeintentiontodo,andtoobtainthespeedyenjoymentandimmediatepossessionofhisproperty,,andthesolequestionforourdeterminationis,canhehaveit?厄尔法官:1880年8月13日,富朗西斯·帕尔默立下一份遗嘱,遗嘱约定他的两个女儿——里格斯和普瑞斯顿,即该案的原告,只能继承其遗产中很少的一部分;剩余大部分遗产由其孙子——即该案的被告埃尔默·帕尔默继承,但假如被告埃尔默·帕尔默先于祖父富朗西斯·帕尔默死去且未结婚,又不存在其他问题,被告帕尔默的母亲——苏珊·帕尔默必须将遗产转予富朗西斯·帕尔默的两位女儿所有。富朗西