文档介绍：苏州大学
硕士学位论文
新旧版高中化学教材中元素化合物知识的比较研究
姓名:陶春敏
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:课程与教学论(化学)
指导教师:沈理明
2010-10
新旧版高中化学教材中元素化合物知识的比较研究中文摘要

中文摘要

教材是教师和学生所能直接感受的课程,是课程目标的具体实现形式。本文
以高中化学的重要组成部分元素化合物内容为切入点,对旧教材、新教材进行了
全面的研究。借助前人的经验和理论,结合本研究的目的,采用文献法、教材分
析法、统计法、比较研究法、案例分析法等方法,定量与定性分析相结合,对新、
旧教材进行了纵向和横向比较。
本研究对于新课程背景下,化学教师实现从“教教材”到“用教材教”的转
变,具有一定的现实意义和重要的参考价值。通过对元素化合物知识目标维度、
内容维度、资源维度的比较,理解新旧课程体系的本质区别,倡导必修化学教学
应该立足新教材,重新建构元素化合物知识体系。对三种新教材元素化合物的内
容选择、结构体系、编写思路、呈现方式等特点进行分析,结合案例提出了合理
化使用新教材的建议。

关键词:新教材旧教材元素化合物比较研究

作者:陶春敏
指导教师:沈理明
I
英文摘要新旧版高中化学教材中元素化合物知识的比较研究

Comparison Studies of The Element pound
Knowledge of The Old and New Textbooks of Senior
High School Chemistry

Abstract
Textbook is what teachers and students can feel directly. It is a specific form
through which curriculum objectives can be realized. Based on the elements and
compounds of senior high school chemistry textbooks, the old and new textbooks are
studied thoroughly. With previous experience and theory bining with the aim of
the present study, a vertical and parison between the new and old
textbook is made using literature method, textbook analytic method, statistics,
comparative research, case analysis and other methods.
Under the background of the new curriculum, this study has certain practical
significance and important reference value for chemistry teachers who can learn to
change from “teaching textbooks” to “teaching using textbooks”. We try to understand
the essential difference between the old and new curriculum paring target
dimensions, content dimension and resources dimension of the element pound
knowledge of the textbooks. We suggest that a new element pound knowledge
system should be reconstructed based on the new textbooks. The material selection,
structure system, writing ideas and the way to present the above things of the elements
pounds of the three textbooks were analyzed. Combining the analysis of some
cases, thi