文档介绍：该【GRE写作高分经验分享 】是由【379266576】上传分享，文档一共【11】页，该文档可以免费在线阅读，需要了解更多关于【GRE写作高分经验分享 】的内容，可以使用淘豆网的站内搜索功能，选择自己适合的文档，以下文字是截取该文章内的部分文字，如需要获得完整电子版，请下载此文档到您的设备，方便您编辑和打印。
GRE写作高分经历分享
GRE写作高分经历分享立论驳论文提分心得不可不看
以下就是我自己总结一点小技巧:首先,我在准备GRE写作备考时,最重要的一个步骤在于熟悉题库和认真准备提纲。
GRE立论文issue经历分享
对于立论文(Issue)说,我觉得自己动手拟一份提纲是非常有用的,你可以参考各种资料,但必须勤动脑,想一想提纲的逻辑连续性。实际上,有偏向性、但又不要绝对化的思路才是最易上手的。
GRE驳论文argument怎么练?
对于驳论文(Argument)而言,我认为熟悉题库更为重要。正常情况下是这样的,但确实有些难题假设不事先好好准备,五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时,我正是因为在准备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目,而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目,所以写得很不好。
写驳论文有很多小窍门,如需要锻炼出区别“事实”和“观点”的才能,不管题目中所给的事实有多夸大都需认为它是对的,不能攻击,只能攻击观点中的逻辑破绽;但凡跟统计数字、统计方法有关的逻辑错误都尽量不要攻击,最多只能一笔带过等等。
GRE作文逻辑重要吗?
虽然逻辑作文总分值只有6分,可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说,它是GRE的精华——因为GRE考的就是逻辑,用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已,主要目的就是考察你的逻辑分析^p程度。
怎样对待GRE作文中的语言程度?
至于GRE作文的语言,其实不是很重要,只要通顺、没有语法错误就可以了,掌握了这些就可以更好地备考GRE作文。希望可以给大家一些参考,从而更好地备考GRE阅读考试。
新GRE写作:审查的公正性
题目:
Censorshipisrarely,ifever,justified.
审查很少可以做到公正。
范文:
“Censorship”isawordwhichseemstobeauthoritativeratherthan
democratic,whichimpliesthewillofthegovernorsratherthanthewillof
,whichcouldbetraced
backtotheAncientRome,ithasbeenplayinganimportantpartinthedomestic
governmentfacesadilemma,isitfairtocarryonthecensorshipatthecostof
sacrificingpartofdemocracy,orjustopenthegatelettingflowsofideasand
thoughtsin,attheriskoflosingitsownrart.
Sincecensorshipsuggestanactofchangingorsuppressingspeech,writing
oranyotherformsofexpressionthatiscondemnedassubversiveofthemon
good,itmusthaveacloserelationshipwiththeonewhoappliessuch
supervision,andtheword“mongood”shouldberedefinedunderdifferent
,andthe
“mongood”isthe“monarchgood”,thenthecensorshipitselfisthe
instrumentofthemonarchwhichsolelydependedonthewillofthemonarch;in
theMiddleAges,boththeRomanCatholicandtheProtestantChurchespracticed
censorshipthatseemedtobeoppressivetoanyideaschallengingthedoctrines
ofchurchesandtheexistenceofGod;evennow,insomeauthoritativecountries,
thecensorshipisusedtoruleitspeoplebyrestrictingtheirminds,ofcourse,
,
censorshipitselfisquestionedattherationalityofexisting,regardlessof
thepracticesmadebythedemocraticgovernment,whilethejusticeofthe
democraticgovernmentisquitedoubtable.
Thematterconcerningisnotonlywhopracticesthecensorshipbutalsohow
art,forexle,itishardtosetupameasurebywhichwecoulddecide
whetheroneshouldbeprohibited,especiallytotheworkofarts,asitscontent
alwayslabeledas“subversive”and“revolutionary”,twowordsdetestedbythe
Chatterley’,thesetwogreatnovelswerefirstly
consideredtobeguiltyofobscenityandwereputtoprohibitionbytheAmerican
government,
censorship,tosomeextent,lagsbehindthedevelopmentofideasandwillput
moreorlessanegativeeffectontheirdevelopment.
Thoughthecensorshipissuchadisgustingwordembodyingsomuch
oppressionandmight,itisapromisewemadewiththerealityfarfrombeing
perfect,
point,Idon’
censorship,thoughrarelyjustified,shouldexistaslongasamoreidealand
practicalformisfoundtoreplaceit,orwecouldonlyexpectourGodtocreate
amoreidealspeciesinsteadofimperfecthumanbeings.
新GRE写作:权威问题
题目:
Muchoftheinformationthatpeopleassumeis‘factual’actuallyturnsout
,anypieceofinformationreferredtoasa‘fact’should
bemistrustedsinceitmaywellbeprovenfalseinthefuture.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此,任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑,因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
范文:
Shouldwebedoubtfultoalltheinformationathandsbecausetherightness
ofwhichisuncertain?Thespeakerclaimsso,Iconcedethatpeopleoftenmit
variousfallaciesinthecourseofcognizingthings,howeverIfundamentally
takeexceptionofthearguer'sassertiontomistrusteveryfactwemight
.
Tobeginwith,thespeakerseemstoimplicatethatafactwouldbeproven
persecuteBruno,thefactneverchangesthattheearthisfarfrombeingthe
centeroftheuniverseasthereligioussovereignshadassumedorhopedfor,
,nomatterhowEdisonhadtriedto
incitethepublicfearanddistrusttothealternativecurrentelectricity,the
factneverchangesthatTeals’electricalsystemisvastlysuperiortohis
directcurrentelectricalone,andwouldbeacceptedandappliedinlarger
range.
However,whatdochangearethehuman'sobjectiveinterpretationstofacts.
Onepellingargumenttothispointisthat,duetothelimitationofhuman’s
knowledgeandprehensivecapability,theytendtomakeinsufficientoreven
,ourprogenitorsbelievedthea
manbeingapatientforthereasonthathehadconductcrimesoroffended
someghostsorspirits,thecontemporarypeoplehavewellknowthatthevaries
ofpathogensarethebasiccausestoourdiseases,andthedefectsofourimmune
changeofprehensiontofactisthatdifferentpeoplealwaysobserveand
pliablewiththeQuantummechanism,noonecallthegreatnessofboth
EinsteinandBohr,becausetheirtheoriesarebasedondistinctviews,the
formerfromthemacrocosmandthelaterfromthemicrocosm.
Notwithstandingtheforegoingreasonsforthathumantendtomakefallacies
duringthecauseofprehendingandcognizingfacts,thesereasonsshould
oncertainrationalinferenceandproperknowledgefundament,theconclusionswe
makemightwellbejustifiable,ifnotpletelyright,
weneedtodoistopromotetheenterpriseofpursuingthebetteranswerandtry
tousetheresultwehavegettoapplication,insteadofwastingourtimeto
understoodthemechanismofhowthedoestheimplantedorganinteractwiththe