文档介绍：“抢劫致人重伤、死亡”疑难问题研究摘要近几年来,随着经济的不断发展,抢劫案件也愈发频繁。然而, 由于法律规定的不完善性,给司法部门的定罪问题带来了很多不便。但问题最终还是要解决,本文对抢劫罪的结果加重犯存在的众多观点进行梳理,从而提出自己的观点,希望对问题的解决有所帮助。本文共分三个部分。第一部分:本部分着重讨论了“抢劫致人重伤或死亡”主观方面的认定。笔者从三个方面来论证自己的观点:结果加重犯的概念,暴力的含义,及法律的具体规定。第二部分:着重讨论抢劫行为与加重结果之间的因果关系。要想让行为人对“抢劫致人重伤或死亡”的重结果负责,必须找出抢劫行为与重结果之间有直接的、必然的因果关系。对那些偶然的事件,如被害人在被抢过程中因心脏病突发而死亡的,行为人不应当对此负责。另外, 要认定因抢劫而致人重伤或死亡,我们还必须对人的范围进行限定,如“人”只能指被害人或第三人,而不能是行为人或其同伙。还有腹中婴儿是否应被包含在内,作者都进行了阐述。第三部分:本部分着重讨论了抢劫致人重伤或死亡在抢劫过程中的定罪问题。笔者认为,在抢劫前预谋***的,或在抢劫过程中,为了排除被害人的反抗而故意***的,故意***仍然是抢劫的手段之一,易定抢劫罪;在抢劫后故意***的,按照犯罪构成理论,应数罪并罚。关键词: 抢劫,致人重伤、死亡, 因果关系,定罪问题 SEVERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE INJURIES AND DEATHS CAUSED BY ROBBERY ABSTRACT In the last few years, with the continuous development of the country, there are more and more robberies. Because of the imperfect of the law, there are many questions in convicting. But the questions should be resolved in the end, the writer point her opinions on the base of others. There are three parts. The first part: the writer talks about the subjective in the process of robbery. The writer proves her points in three areas: the meaning of violence, the concept of Consequential Aggravated Criminal, the specific legal provisions. The second part: the writer talks about the relationship between robbery and the results. We must point out that there are direct and musty relationships if we want to make the perpetrator be responsible for his behavior. For those accidental events, the behavior should not be responsible for that. Besides, we should limit the scope of“ men ”, the “ men ” means victims and other persons, not the behavior and his associates. The writer talks about the fetus, too. The third part: the writer talks about the convicting in the process of robbery chiefly. The writer thinks that the behavior should be responsible robbery if he murders others before or in the process of robbery, because murder just is the means of robbery. If the murder occurs after the robbery, the behavior should be responsible for murder and ro